Inviting a Monkey to Tea: Befriending Your Mind and Discovering Lasting Contentment
Sunday, September 30, 2012
BOOK RELEASE!!!!!!!
Monday, October 1st, my new book is available for purchase!!!!!
Inviting a Monkey to Tea: Befriending Your Mind and Discovering Lasting Contentment
Inviting a Monkey to Tea: Befriending Your Mind and Discovering Lasting Contentment
Monday, September 17, 2012
The Myth of Happiness and Why it Makes Us Un-Happy
We want to be happy. Everyone,
everywhere, is trying to find—and hold onto—happiness. We do everything we are
supposed to do: diligently follow the instructions, practice the techniques,
and still, more often than we should be (given the amount of effort we are
putting in) we are not consistently happy. As a psychotherapist and interfaith
minister, I have spent the last two decades watching people feed their
addiction to happiness; they get their short term fix here and there, but end
up back on the street searching for
happiness yet again, even more desperate.
The thing we want most and spend the majority of our time trying to
accomplish eludes us.
We human beings
are remarkable creatures,. We can
do anything we set out to do. So why not lasting happiness? Why is there such a
split between our desire for happiness and our ability to hang onto it? After
many years of listening to people talk about their failed attempts to hang onto
a state of happiness, I began asking myself the following questions: What is
this thing we call happiness? Is it achievable? Is it reliable? Is it
sustainable?
As I studied the
state of happiness, I became intensely aware of its fragility. When our life circumstances change and
we lose the object that’s been making us happy…poof, our happiness is gone.
When uncomfortable feelings appear within our state of happiness or the object
that was bringing us happiness no longer works, happiness again disappears. We are constantly acquiring and losing
happiness.
I began to see
that it is not our efforts to create happiness that are flawed, but rather, our
choice of happiness as a goal.
Happiness is the wrong goal for this life. Happiness relies on our ability to control circumstances
that, no matter how hard we try, we cannot control. Happiness relies on
circumstances staying the same. Life always changes, uncomfortable feelings
always arise, and what we want is always in flux. This is the nature of
life. The choice of continual
happiness as a pursuit is irreconcilably flawed.
Normal life is not
easy for anyone. Why then do we
expect ourselves to be happy all the time? This foolish expectation creates
tremendous suffering. Rather than trying to hang onto something whose nature is
transitory, we can discover a state of wellbeing that is able to withstand and
flourish within the inherent volatility of a human life. We should be grateful for happiness
when it is here, but as a goal for life, it is unwise.
Is there something
larger, deeper, more lasting than happiness? Is there a state of well-being
that can sustain itself in the midst of the changing circumstances and
emotional shifts that life includes? Is there a way to feel grounded and well
even when the contents of our life are not? If so, what shift must we make to discover this state that
is deeper and larger than happiness?
For a long time, I
used my spiritual practice to try and
achieve peace and happiness. And I
did, in stretches. And yet, again and again, when life presented its toughest
challenges, inevitably, the peace and happiness that I had achieved slipped
away. Somewhere along the path I
got tired—luckily, tired of trying to get to peace and happiness, or rather, of
getting there and watching it disintegrate. And with my weariness came an
interesting development: I got curious about what was actually true. I stopped trying to do something with what I was experiencing, to change it in any way,
and just let myself see what was there, to experience what I was experiencing.
No longer trying to get to somewhere else, my meditation practice,
and consequently my life, could then be what it was, whatever that meant at any
particular moment. It was through
this shift that I began to glimpse a state of being that is radically different
and amazingly okay, a state that is deeper and more eternal than
happiness. Indeed, it was not
until I stopped trying to create happiness—as a way out of now—and started
investigating what is here—a way in—that I discovered a doorway to something
far more blissful than happiness had ever offered.
We spend our lives
trying to get to some imaginary there,
where lasting happiness awaits.
What we don’t know how to do is to get to here, where we are.
We discover well-being when we shift our focus toward this moment and
what is actually here. The secret to well-being is counter-intuitive: allow
whatever is happening inside you to happen; don’t do anything with it.; don’t
judge it; don’t try to change it; don’t turn it into an identity—something that
says something about who you are. Allow the feelings, allow the thoughts,
allow all experience to happen within you without turning any of it into a
story about you and your life.
When we let go of achieving a particular outcome with our experience and
meet our experience as it is—wanted or not— we discover a state of deep
contentment that relies on nothing and no one, and is inherently and eternally
ours. Indeed, we discover who we
really are.
Excerpted from the upcoming book, Inviting
A Monkey to Tea: Befriending Your Mind and Discovering Lasting Contentment. (October, 2012, Hohm Press)
The Dial-In Conversation: When Auto-Responders Meet
At a certain age, does
everyone feel like they have had every conversation they are ever going to
have—that every conversation (other than those with intimates) is pre-packaged,
as if chosen from a sampler menu on an airplane playlist? Is it an inevitable part of living
longer, that conversations begin to feel like some kind of strange dance in
which we follow pre-determined scripts with no real meaning? Or, possibly, is conversation itself
changing?
From what I can remember, in
just the last couple days I have successfully (or so I imagine) dialed in the
following pre-digested conversations:
- having a dog in the city
- city versus suburb
life/car vs. walking/peace vs. energy
- country house vs. new
weekend adventures
- change in air travel
experience
- pre-school admission
process
- real estate (everywhere)
in relation to New York
- date night for mom and
dad/need for
- the glassification of
the urban landscape
- career nanny vs. young
vibrant babysitter choice
- youth texting/screen
time addiction
- children’s birthday
parties/costs/frequency
- overscheduled
children/old days when we had to create a game from a stick/organized classes
vs. street play
- Costco shopping/bulk
toilet paper
And these are just the
handful I can remember.
The 100-calorie
conversation—all subjects available for purchase in snack-size pouches.
Within these pre-packaged
interactions can be found an infinite array of standardized danglers, the
little niceties we toss at one another that mean less than nothing. Perhaps we do
all this because we believe that this is what we are supposed to do as members
of society? “Safe travel,”
“Everything good?” “Where
did the summer go?” “Take good care of you,” “Better to end vacation when it’s raining than sunny!”
“Enjoy it now, it goes so fast.” “Three kids, two hands.” And on it goes…
While I don’t recall agreeing
to play a part in this grand performance, nonetheless, every day I watch as I
too cheerfully embark into the land of canned dialogue, as if I were reading
words off an internal teleprompter.
Like puppets, we lip synch our pre-scripted parts with the proper
enthusiasm and feigned newness, dutifully behaving as good members of
society. Despite the ease with
which it all unfolds, in the midst of it, I often hear myself silently asking,
“Really… are we going to do this… this dance that we are trained to do, this
exchange of language that means nothing, and that we have done a thousand times
before?” So too, I wonder who
wrote this script that we all recite from cellular memory for reasons that we
don’t even know? Nonetheless, as
the thoughts stream through, I continue dancing the touch-less dance. With furrowed brow, the seal still balances
the bowling pin on her nose.
Recently, while pondering
these questions, my attention was drawn to my cat and dog, who were playing on
the floor below me. The two are
best friends, as if brother and sister… the boy being so active and the girl so
relational right from the start (oops…I accidentally pressed the son vs.
daughter switch on my conversation playlist). In any case, the two animals spend a lot of time (and seem
to deeply enjoy) just bumping and nudging each other. But the scene got me thinking. Maybe conversation is not
really about the content of the words but rather a way of simply establishing
contact that is friendly and acknowledging. It might be that all these pre-scripted conversations and
time-consuming niceties are akin to my Shiba Inu smushing her nose into her big
orange companion; a way to acknowledge those with whom we share the same
floor/planet at the same time in history.
I am an optimist and thus I
enjoy a warm-hearted interpretation of our pre-scripted conversations as some
form of human bumping and smushing.
And yet, deep down, I worry that this societal play that we are
performing has more pessimistic implications. I can’t help but wonder if the
rise of technology, as the primary form of communication in our culture, is not
related to our conversations sounding more and more like computer-generated recordings.
I am fairly certain that we
used to use conversation as a way to connect, get closer, bridge the separation
we feel. Conversation is now
becoming a means to just the opposite end—something that we use to disconnect
and avoid contact; a dance in which nobody touches. The pre-packaged interaction that we are dialing in with
increasing ease and regularity acts as a foam pad through which we humans are
less and less able to pass.
Is it possible that
conversation itself is being kidnapped by the technological milieu of our
time? Is conversation becoming a
franchised product, like a mahogany side table at Restoration Hardware—and
thereby disappearing into a corporate-sponsored vacuum? As conversation morphs into
pre-digested, bite-sized portions, I wonder how, where and if we will go about
forming bridges with those we don’t know.
Perhaps new means will be found—computer programs that bypass the need
for conversation or sharing experience.
Or perhaps, like our tail, the need for conversation and connection will
simply be bred out of the species—no longer necessary for optimum
productivity. For now, I suppose
we are left to watch and wait, and most importantly, refrain from turning this
dialogue into another pre-packaged and disposable version of itself. Stay tuned…
Dreams to Dollars... Says Who?
Live your passion and the money will follow... or
so the story goes. If we ignore the thought that says, "I can't afford
it," and replace it with the thought that says, "Trust the
universe," then all of our material desires will be fulfilled. Like a
Burger King, we simply put our order in with the universe and the universe
delivers. If we design the right vision board, repeat the right affirmations,
"believe in" the universe, inheritances will show up just when they
are needed (without losing anyone we know), bank errors will appear in our
favor, and competitions that we didn't know we entered will be won. The list of
fortunes awaiting us is endless and endlessly delicious.
The idea is that the universe is a good parent who
rewards its good children (with things) and punishes its bad ones with
deprivation. We are good when we think only good thoughts and follow our dreams
and successfully block out anything that hints of doubt, fear or
"negativity." In practice, this myth causes enormous suffering and is
in fact false. Many people are doing exactly what they want to be doing with
their life and yet never financially gain from it, not even a penny. The
absence of capital gain is not a contradiction to the correctness of the path,
as the myth-makers claim. However, those who are doing everything
"right" and still not receiving cash windfalls or job offers by the
dozen are left feeling inadequate and to blame for their inability to manifest
material abundance. "I am supposed to get what I want from the universe!
Everyone else does! What am I doing wrong that makes the universe not reward me?"
The dreams to dollars myth sets up an expectation
that we should be rewarded financially for what we like to do. Says who? Why
does the universe owe us this? What's more, why is financial reward the gauge
for whether or not what we are doing is the right path? Isn't the fact that we
enjoy what we are doing, that it interests, awakens or challenges us, enough of
a reason to do it?
But perhaps most toxic about this myth is that it
turns our attention away from the real reward that it is to live our passion,
namely, to live our passion. What gets missed is the reward that is right here
-- already. The reward is the passion, the wanting, the intention, the
experience itself. The destination is the process. We need not look any farther
than right here for our passion's value and legitimacy. The myth that we should
be financially compensated for doing what we love vacuums the love from the
process itself. So too, it burdens the experience with an expectation that it
deliver something that the experience is not responsible for delivering. As a
result, the expectation transforms something joyful into something
disappointing and resent-able. Really, is it not a thing of wonder that we wake
up in the morning at all, much less wake up, want to do something, and actually
get to do it? Is that not remarkable enough?
We are constantly wishing for some larger entity
that will reward us when we are good and punish us when we are bad. We so want
to believe that some one, some thing, is in charge of us, and if we play by the
rules it will all work out and we will get everything we want. We construct
myriad larger than us, solid structures to feel safe and in control. Oh how we
try to create a knowable order in all this mystery we call life. In the process
of trying, however, we infantilize ourselves and reject life as it is
happening.
The universe begins and ends within us. The
structure we impose is a construction. Our rewards and punishments all exist right here in
our own consciousness. In truth, we don't need a larger anything to be
fulfilled. In expecting a sign from the universe to assure us that we are on
the right path, a cash reward for listening to our own wisdom, we are
abandoning the very wisdom that we seek to validate. After all, what is the
universe if not our wisdom -- the wisdom we have mysteriously been gifted with?
Paradoxically, we reject and ignore the universe
when we expect and demand that the universe appear to and for us. The gold
stars that are supposed to appear are in fact already here -- if we dare follow
the glitter into ourselves and this very moment's experience!
Technology: Your Mind on Crack
If generating "to do" lists were an Olympic event,
the human mind would surely take home the gold. While undoubtedly useful for many tasks, the mind is also an
unsettled and frantic creature whose basic state is agitation. The mind is in a
state of constant craving; desperately seeking something to do, fix or figure
out. The mind is not wired to land
here, but instead, always beckoning our attention into the past or future. The mind does not want us to live this
moment directly, but rather seeks to turn this moment into a project about
which something can be done, or alternatively, a statement about our identity.
What do we need to do about this moment, what does this moment mean about our
past or future, what does this moment say about what kind of person we
are? These are the things the mind
wants to know about now, but certainly
not what now actually is. The mind acts as a moderator between
our life and us. To the mind,
being equals death--doing equals life.
Enter technology.
Injecting technology into the human mind is like shooting a wild,
agitated, drunken monkey with a thousand CC's of adrenaline. The mind is thrilled, but what about we
who have to house that wild monkey?
If you ask a crack addict what will make him well, he will
tell you more crack, and he will be sure of it. The crack addict is the wrong one to ask what he needs. More
crack will not make him feel well, but will only calm his shakes... for a short
time. And then his suffering will
return--with more ferocity. Similarly, the mind is the wrong part of ourselves
to ask what will make us well. The
mind tells us that more will satisfy us--more information, more entertainment,
more choices, more everything.
More will make us whole--and ironically--give us a place where we can
rest and finally enjoy less. In truth, the mind is painfully mistaken. We do not need more frequent
communication; we need deeper connections. We do not need more sound bites of forgettable information;
we need more meaningful dialogue.
We do not need more entertainment; we need to get interested in our own
imagination and creativity. We do
not need more ways to get away from ourselves and now; we need to meet
ourselves and discover the wonder of this moment. Well-being can only live in
this now and if we are not in it, we will never experience it.
When I ask people what makes them feel truly well, I
generally hear one of three things: connection with other people, creativity,
and spirit-oriented activities. In
all my years asking this question, never have I heard the answer: technology.
People that spend all day checking and re-checking their devices--checking for
what they do not even know--do not feel well at day's end. They are addicts
seeking relief--relief ultimately from the belief that there is somewhere
better, more important, more fun, or simply more bearable than here. At the end of all their frantic
information and entertainment-gorging, they feel despairing and anxious--bloated
yet ravenous and mal-nourished. Their addiction has grown stronger, along with
their belief that something somewhere will complete them and offer them a place
to—at last—be, if they could only find it.
Technology is breeding the addiction to distraction into the
human species, just as you would breed long ears into a dog breed. It is breeding out the capacity to be
with ourselves or anyone else, and worst of all, to be here, the stuff that
true well-being is made of.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)